History
Common man started out to be quite dumb compared to where we are now. There was a lack of intelligence in common man. Of course there were those who made what the world is today, but the point to be noted is that there were only 'those' not all (everyone).
Common men have been just living off the accomplishments of 'those' who make the world what it is today. They have never been in situations that needed them to portray/exercise their intelligence. Due to which, over a long long period of time, their intelligence (if intelligence could be a measured entity) has just increased by a very titsy unit. While 'those' who mold this world got REALLY intelligent.
Those:
Refers to the men, and of course women, :
. who mold this world
. who add/give meaning and purpose to our existence
. sometimes as simply put as 'think'
People:
Common man + 'those'
My Belief
Intelligence is going to rule this world one day. It is going to become a standard.
Every part of everyday would no longer be of what is seen and heard, but also of the activity in the peoples' minds and the harmony that is established due to the resonance of the thought process that the people involved share.
Piece of meaning, Lack of intelligence (LOI), Situations and Moungoes
Piece of meaning (POM):
'Those' create many entities that I call 'Pieces of meaning' (POM) to create what ever they want to create.
These POMs were created with the intention to always, ALWAYS, perform one and only one operation.
These POMs when used together completes the creation.
e.g. A curtain rod's usage is only to hold a curtain up.
It is was not created to be used (even if it can or not):
. As a header for a curtain
. As a pole to be held onto while trying to reach for something above it
. As a pole to hit someone who
.. Walks near a window they are not supposed to
.. Wonders what other usage a curtain rod can be
.. Wonders what other usage a curtain rod can be
Lack of intelligence (LOI):
When used refers to a combination of:
. Lack of intelligence
. Usage of wrong intelligence.
. Usage of a POM for an unintended (unintended by the creator) purpose
Situations:
Situations (in this context) are the times in which the common man portrays or uses his (LOI) to deal with situations.
Moungoes
A Moungoes could be a common man in a 'situation' or one of 'those' in a situation'. But most of the time it is just one of the common men !
Moungoes hunter
One who writes about Moungoes situations.
What is to be noticed
In a 'situation' to be noticed is, the display of LOI by the Moungoes(s) involved. The LOI might not be clearly visible, it might need some intelligence.
Use the comments for any queries or comments (!) on the post.
Reason for the necessity for the vagueness in the LOI of the post:
In an effort not to discover/give rise to the Moungoes in you.
Note:
This blog is not meant to be funny.
Posts
the usage of POM for an unintended purpose as described in LOI can be disputed against on the basis of intellectual growth of "those"..
ReplyDeletethere has been a generalization which has been made which should be mended..
as it is evident that if an object, article or theory is used solely only for its POM, then the diversification of the same would be impossible!
e.g. if kate (yes now the blogger is paying attention!)didn't improvise on the findings of the plane wreck..she would perish on the island..hence.. sometimes "those" have to be exempted from the theories made in POM..
what would differentiate "those" from the "moungoes" would be the "how when and why"..which would be answered by the question.. "why not just a hair band"..
cheerios.
"usage of a POM for an unintended purpose"
ReplyDelete=> To look deeper into creation of POMs. When the creator creates his POM, he is NOT intending to use that POM to serve other purposes.
This does not mean that a POM cannot serve for more than one purpose.
The LOI is visible when a 'Moungoes' uses a POM for a problem that does not get completely solved or when there exists a different well defined intended POM to serve the purpose (e.g. the hair band)
"as it is evident that if an object, article or theory is used solely only for its POM, then the diversification of the same would be impossible!"
=> Here the point is that a POM is created for the intention to serve one purpose (the purpose is defined by the creator).
But there are other 'those' that can use a POM as a part of a different creation. Here credit should not only be given to the other 'those' that used the POM but also to the creator of the POM. As the POM being used was created with such a clear definition that it made usable by someone else.
The meaning of the word POM was not intended to be diversified. But if one can find another purpose for it, very well.
If you look really closely to a purpose a POM is being used in different creations you will see that the POM actually serves the same purpose in all the cases.
The degree of definition of all the POMs used in creation is what defines the structural integrity of that creation.
And yes now the blogger paid attention :)